Dixie Heritage News – Fri, Dec 15, 2017




A fire department in central North Carolina refuses to furl its Confederate Flag, despite an ultimatum from county officials.


The Uwharrie Volunteer Fire Department, deep in a national forest in Montgomery County, about 100 miles southwest of Raleigh, has flown a Confederate Flag outside the firehouse for years. County commissioners ordered the department last month to take down the Flag or face the loss of $19,000 a year in funding.


The department was organized as a nonprofit corporation in 1983 and owns the firehouse, but the county provides financial support for operations, as well as two fire trucks. Commissioners said they would pay only for fuel and maintenance for the trucks and would remove the Uwharrie name from the trucks in favor of decals promoting equality and freedom of speech.


Fire department officials couldn’t be reached for comment Thursday, and county leaders declined to comment on the dispute.


“The County will take reasonable and forcible steps to try and get the flag removed but will not place this issue above public safety,” commissioners said in a letter sent to the fire department.


Meanwhile, the department recently put up a sign outside the firehouse: We Support Equal Rights.


Firefighters maintain that the Flag represents history and heritage, so commissioners have offered to pay for a heritage monument to replace the Flag.


Department officials told a Montgomery County newspaper last month that, if they took the flags down, they would lose a lot of donations from people in the community.


Confederate flags also fly next door to and across the street from the firehouse, and a number of comments on Facebook support the department.


“This FD will continue on with donations from supporters and will continue to fly whatever flag they choose,” says one comment.




The Carolina Flaggers planned to be in the Summerville, South Carolina Christmas Parade carrying the Confederate Flag.


The parade was put on by the Summerville Downtown Restoration Enhancement And Management.


They initially approved the Flagger’s participation, but their executive director, Michael Lisle, said in a statement:


“When the Carolina Flaggers arrived for the parade yesterday, their entry was visually vetted and determined to be out of compliance with the guidelines established during our initial vetting of their application. We advised them of such and gave them the opportunity to fix the issue instead of immediately removing them from the parade lineup.”


Carolina Flaggers spokesman James Bessenger says they removed all but one Confederate Battle Flag when asked, and never heard anything else.


He said it was not until they made it to the intersection of Main Street that there seemed to be any problem.


Bessenger says the group wants to show Southern pride, display the Confederate Flag, educate the public, speak to people, things that seem to be taboo for the past two and a half years.


He says, “We made those changes and never heard anything else. And it wasn’t until we made it to the intersection of Main Street that there seemed to be any problem.”


Another group, The Sons of Confederate Veterans did participate in the parade carrying the Confederate Flag.


Bessenger says the Carolina Flaggers plan to take action, possibly suing for breach of contract.




An investigation has been launched after controversial stickers were spotted on a lunch cooler at a City of Milwaukee construction site.


A picture has been making the rounds on social media. You can see a sticker with the Confederate Flag, and one reading the Invisible Empire Ku Klux Klan.


The man who took the photo says he spotted the stickers at 25th and Wells, and the workers who were doing road repairs refused to talk to him about it.


Milwaukee’s Department of Public Works is not happy. They released this statement saying:


“This afternoon, the City of Milwaukee became aware of this photograph posted on social media. The stickers are offensive to the Administration and DPW. If, in fact, the cooler with the stickers belongs to an individual working on a City contract, it would be best if the individual works someplace other than the City of Milwaukee. DPW continues to investigate this matter.”


Three days after the image of the cooler began to make the rounds on social media, the worker was fired, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.




The executive director of the South Carolina Confederate Relic Room and Military Museum plans to present a proposal to the museum’s commission in February which will include plans for the display of the Confederate Battle Flag that was removed from State House grounds in 2015.


Director Allen Roberson told the commission Thursday morning that he will make a Confederate Flag display proposal at a Feb. 15 meeting. If the commission adopts that proposal, it will then move on to the General Assembly for approval.


The state Legislature previously balked at a $3.6 million plan that would have included funding not only for a display for the Flag that was removed from the State House, but also for a robust museum update and expansion.


While he didn’t release greater details, Roberson talked a bit about the proposal he’s going to make in February.


“The proposal we are going to have is going to use space that we already have,” in the museum, Roberson says. “It’s going to take existing office space and convert it into a separate gallery space. Because the staff and the commission feels that the Flag needs to be displayed separately from the military theme. … It’s more of a political artifact than that. [The specific Flag removed from the State House] was not carried in battle. It doesn’t have an identity for that.”


Roberson says the display for the Battle Flag, and the remodeling of the space where it will be, will come at a cost just north of $300,000.


As for the Flag itself, Roberson says it is in storage, “under alarms and security.”




The City of Memphis filed a petition in Davidson County Chancery Court on Monday. Officials asked for judicial review of the Tennessee Historical Commission’s denial of a request to remove the statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest from Health Sciences Park.


Protesters have called for the statue’s removal, saying it represents racism and bigotry. City leaders have discussed ways to relocate the statue of Forrest and move his remains, which are buried under the monument.


On Oct. 13, the Nashville-based historical commission denied the City’s request for a waiver to Tennessee’s Heritage Protection Act, which limits the removal or changing of historical memorials on public property. The waiver would allow the City to relocate the statue.


State Law passed in 2013 prevents the removal or relocation of statues or monuments honoring U.S. wars located on public property. The 2013 act also says no statue of a historical military figure may be renamed or rededicated.


In 2016, the General Assembly changed the act. It now prohibits the removal or relocation of any statue or memorial honoring a historic conflict, historic entity or historic figure from public property.


City attorney Allan Wade argues in the petition that Memphis filed its waiver request under the original act, which does not say that statues of historical military figures can’t be removed – only that they can’t be renamed or rededicated. The city claims the waiver request filed March 7, 2016, came before changes made to the act to include language applicable to the Forrest statue went into effect.


“By its express terms the 2013 act does not prevent a Historical Military Figure Memorial from being relocated, removed, altered or otherwise disturbed as long as it is not renamed or rededicated, ” the petition states.


The commission’s waiver denial was illegal and arbitrary, Wade argues. The petition seeks a decree from the court ordering that the city has the right to remove or relocate the Forrest statue.


Commission Executive Director E. Patrick McIntyre Jr. declined to comment.




The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) announced on Tuesday they had initiated a review of the legality of bump-fire stocks.


“The Department of Justice has the duty to enforce our laws, protect our rights, and keep the American people safe,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a press release. “Possessing firearm parts that are used exclusively in converting a weapon into a machine gun is illegal, except for certain limited circumstances. Today we begin the process of determining whether or not bump stocks are covered by this prohibition.”


The ATF began the regulatory process on Tuesday by submitting an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to the Office of Management and Budget.


“We will go through the regulatory process that is required by law and we will be attentive to input from the public,” Sessions said. “This Department is serious about firearms offenses, as shown by the dramatic increase in firearms prosecutions this year. The regulatory clarification we begin today will help us to continue to protect the American people by carrying out the laws duly enacted by our representatives in Congress.”


Bump-fire stocks have come under scrutiny after they were used by a shooter in Las Vegas, Nev., to kill 58 people.




A federal grand jury has issued an indictment against Jose Inez Garcia Zarate, the illegal alien who was acquitted on state charges of murder and manslaughter in the shooting of Kate Steinle.


President Trump took to Twitter immediately after the decision, stating, “The Kate Steinle killer came back and back over the weakly protected Obama border, always committing crimes and being violent, and yet this info was not used in court. His exoneration is a complete travesty of justice. BUILD THE WALL!”


The Mexican national will now face new immigration and gun charges as announced by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Attorney for the Northern District of California Brian Stretch and ATF Special Agent in Charge Jill Snyder.


Detailed in a press release issued by the Department of Justice’s Northern District of California, the indictment against Garcia Zarate is for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition and for being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm and ammunition. If convicted of the charges, the 47-year-old Garcia Zarate faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.


On Dec. 1, a day after Garcia Zarate was acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges, the Justice Department issued a warrant for his arrest citing violation of his supervised release.


Garcia Zarate is currently being held in California state custody and is expected to be sentenced in state court on the weapons charge on Dec. 14.




Larry A. Silverstein, the developer of the World Trade Center complex in New York City, has won a $95.2 million settlement against American Airlines Group Inc., United Continental Holdings Inc., and other defendants with ties to the aviation industry for losses sustained during the 9/11 attacks, it was recently reported.


Insurers for American and United Airlines will cover the multi-million-dollar settlement reached with Silverstein and his property management firm, Silverstein Properties.


According to the “official account,” American and United airliners were hijacked by radical Islamic terrorists connected to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network on 9/11 and flown into the iconic Twin Towers in New York City-the two largest buildings in the World Trade Center complex-causing their destruction that fateful day.


Silverstein became the primary leaseholder of the World Trade Center complex shortly before 9/11. It had previously been managed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey but was transferred to private hands-Silverstein and his Silverstein Properties-in the weeks leading up to 9/11.


Skeptics of the official 9/11 tale maintain this move was designed to both facilitate the attacks and enrich a man (Silverstein) alleged by some to have played a key role in orchestrating the attacks.


Six weeks prior to 9/11, Silverstein won a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center complex with a minimal investment of roughly $14 million. Almost immediately, Silverstein purchased an insurance policy on the complex that included acts of terrorism. Since 9/11, Silverstein has collected over $4 billion in insurance settlement money as a result of the attack, a huge figure considering his original investment.




The Trump administration’s efforts to block a major climate change lawsuit that was brought on novel grounds by a group of ykids who do not even have the legal capacity to sue appeared to suffer a setback Monday at a hearing before a federal appeals court.


The lawsuit, Juliana v. United States, was filed in 2015 on behalf of 21 youths who are accusing the government of violating their constitutional rights by failing to address “climate change” and continuing to subsidize fossil fuels.


A federal district judge earlier this year set a trial date for February. But in July, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals paused the case after the Justice Department invoked an unusual legal maneuver to try to block the lawsuit.


On Monday, two of the three judges on the panel seemed dubious of the move.


Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, has been following the case and said the judges’ questions and comments on Monday suggested they would send the case back to the district court and allow it to proceed. “They said it’s too early to be here,” Gerrard said.


Last year, the district judge denied the government’s motion to dismiss the case. After President Donald Trump took office, however, the Justice Department asked for a writ of mandamus-essentially an order from an appeals court to a lower one, generally to correct an abuse. The Department of Justice contended in its petition that the district court had “rendered unprecedented and clearly erroneous rulings” by failing to dismiss the case and had demonstrated “a remarkable disregard for essential separation-of-powers limitations.”


At the hearing on Monday in San Francisco, Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, said there was no precedent for issuing such a writ under these conditions and that if the judges did issue it, there would be “no logical boundary to it.”


The plaintiffs are seeking to establish “a constitutional right to a stable climate,” and they’re asking the courts to order the federal government to rapidly cut the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions.


Another judge, Alex Kozinski, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, pressed Julia Olson, the lawyer for the children and executive director of the advocacy group Our Children’s Trust, on the merits of the case.


After these oral arguments, the judges will now have to decide whether to intervene. If they send the case back to the district court, Gerrard expects the Justice Department would look for other ways to prevent the case from going to trial, where the government could be forced to produce documents and depositions that could reveal deliberations on decades of federal climate policies.


When asked whether the plaintiffs have a shot, Gerrard said, “they have a better shot today than they did yesterday.”


Our friend, HK Edgerton, submits the following:


As I stood with the Southern Cross posted on Tuesday December 12, 2017 , a young lady would tell me that I needed to define why I cared so much about the Confederate soldier that I would stand out in the cold of this day with his Colors posted.



I would tell her there is no reward equal to the respect of one’s fellow man. It is a reward that must be earned , and few are there who gain it in the degree and the measure so universally, and with so many people, as did the Confederate soldier. The life of such a man is an encouragement to everyone who knows of it.


I would tell her of the many places that I had been listening to the pre-planned script that the Southern Poverty Law Center has in place on its web site to discredit the memory of the Confederate soldier. And, how I often wondered if these individuals who stand before Commissions, Councils, Boards, and especially the Almighty God trying to expound upon the lies they read, have any conscious.


And, after watching the Hillsborough County Commissioner Les Miller, and Commissioner Charles Smith of Bradenton, Florida, extort the vote they needed from their fellow Commission members by utilizing the thugs of Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and the rest of the thugs that George Soros could round up, to discredit the monuments to his memory; my conclusion is they have no moral fibre for me to draw upon; my only choice to deterge their actions was to come to the streets with my case, by following the Charge of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, and taking it to the people.


So, what is that Charge would ask a young man who now stood before me along with several people who had also joined the young lady and I listening in? With a big grin on my face I would recite the Charge of the Sons of Confederate Veterans issued by the Honorable General Stephen Dill Lee in New Orleans, La. in 1906 : “To you, Sons of Confederate Veterans, we submit the vindication of the cause we fought; to your strength will be given the defense of the Confederate Soldier’s good name, the guardianship of his history, the emulation of his virtues, the perpetuation of those principles he loved and which made him glorious and which you also cherish. remember, it is your duty to see that the true history of the South is presented to future generations.” And, now folks here I stand doing just that.


Suddenly, a group of young Black men, and women would drive by proclaiming that Mr. HK, we got your back; while giving their version of the Rebel Yell which sounded more like a song of baptism. I would accept the hugs from all, with the exception of the lone Yankee who looked so confused with what he had witnessed and heard.


I would return home in time to listen to the live feed of a Commission meeting in Defuniac Springs, Florida and the Public debate about taking down the 1st National Flag from the flag pole on the courthouse grounds. To confirm what I had just told the young people earlier, of all things, a White woman would tell the commission how when she was younger, traveling through the South with her family how disturbed and offended she would become at the site of the many Battle Flags she saw. Ironic, I thought. That Southern Poverty Law Center message was really meant for Black folks to recite , and she wasn’t doing a very good job of convincing anyone present.


God bless you!


Your brother,


Russell Walker submits the following:


In light of Doug Jones victory in the Alabama Senate race I thought that I would review the trial of Thomas Edwin Blanton for the church bombing of in Birmingham in 1963. Doug Jones was the prosecutor.


Blanton (83) has never admitted guilt and is in jail today.


Whether a defendant is innocent or guilty it is the government’s duty to present him with a fair trial and not an excuse that is rigged from start to finish for conviction.


That trial has got to be one of the most corrupt in US history.


First of all it was 37 years between the explosion and the trial. Tell me about 6th amendment “speedy trial” protections.


Blanton claimed that several witnesses had died but the Court said that it did not matter.


Blanton was brought to trial just 66 days after the presentation of the Indictment. I can tell you from experience that no defendant can defend himself in a felony prosecution in just a few months.


The FBI used a microphone attached to a wall in Blanton’s Apartment and used testimony between Blanton and his wife at trial. So you think that you have privacy in your own home between you and your wife. Not when the government says that you do not.


That was outrageous on the part of Jones’ part. He is corrupt as can be and follows the win at any cost including destruction of the values of Western civilization.


There were no witnesses connecting Blanton to the church. The case was purely circumstantial. Jury selection was similarly biased. If you admitted to being a “racist” you were dismissed for cause. However “non-racists” were purely acceptable. So much for a jury of your peers and religious qualifications of jurors.


Couple that with a double closing statement for the prosecution and only one for the defendant, you can guess the outcome in this very politically charged trial.


Moore in his senate campaign allowed the persona of Jones to be untarnished. Moore was being continually attacked by the media, by California lawyer Gloria Allred, at war, under siege and he used no weapons against Jones while he was being called a child pervert etc.


No wonder he lost.


An article from RedState.com reports “Roy Moore refused to concede the U.S. Senate race to Doug Jones on Tuesday night…”


“[T]he Moore campaign could contest the results and pay for a recount. But the Republican Alabama Secretary of State said during an interview with CNN Tuesday night that it’s “highly unlikely” the outcome of the election would change, even with a recount. ”


That’s assuming that no vote fraud is uncovered.


Roy Moore was leading his opponent by four to five percent for most of the evening on Tuesday. About two hours into the vote counting, Moore was ahead of Jones by 8.4 percent with 68 percent of the vote in. Normally with that enormous a lead with only 32 percent of the vote remaining, the election would have been called in Roy Moore’s favor.


Instead, we were told that the election swung by 9.2 percent against Moore with the next 21 percent of the vote. Various news agencies then started calling the election for Jones with 89 percent of the vote in even though Jones was only 0.8 percent ahead with 11 percent of the vote uncounted. If the election could swing that radically, why would anyone think that the election was over at that point?


Watching the mainstream news anchors, I got the impression that they were practically scripted. No one questioned the wild swings in the election or the premature decision to declare Doug Jones the winner.


An expert on election fraud once observed that the Democrats will withhold the results from Democrat districts, where they control the vote-counting, until after the districts, they don’t control, have voted, so that they know how many votes they need to steal. That appears to be exactly what happened Tuesday night. Roy Moore was 8.4 percent ahead and then an unbelievable (and I mean unbelievable) number of votes for Doug Jones suddenly flooded in.


One seven percent chunk of votes went 93 percent for Doug Jones. Even if this were an all-Black district, the pro-abortion, far-left liberal Doug Jones would have been unlikely to get that high a percentage.


One political blog had the following comment: “Hillary beat Trump 151,000 to 130,000 in Jefferson County in 2016. Jones is now leading Moore 103,000 to 30,000 in Jefferson County. …the thing was stolen.”


The Republican vote dropping from 130,000 to just 30,000 is extremely suspicious. With a limited number of registered voters in each district, it may not have been possible for the Democrats to come up with enough votes for Jones to give him a plurality. Faking an extra 100,000 votes carries considerable risk. It’s far safer to make the opponent’s votes disappear, which appears to be what happened in some Democrat-controlled districts. Perhaps someone should check the dumpsters in the Democrat districts to see how many ballots for Roy Moore wound up there.


The election in Alabama was stolen. The Democrats tried slandering Moore with fabricated sexual assault charges. Opinion polls were showing that this smear campaign had failed and that Moore was as much as seven percent ahead of Jones as noted here. The Democrat willingness to lie was only exceeded by their willingness to commit vote fraud.


It appears now that the smear campaign was a cover for stealing the election since the normally conservative majority in Alabama, who elected Jeff Sessions, would never vote for a pro-abortion, far-left liberal like Doug Jones.




ALEX JONES (HOST): Notice the Democrat judge said, “Oh, we’re going to erase all the computer files after tonight, on Wednesday morning. So there’s going to be no recount. Ha ha ha. Try that Moore.”


Click this link to read about how there have been lawsuits in Alabama to preserve the digital images of the ballots cast at electronic machines in this election – and how the courts have ordered those images DESTROYED.


Why destroy the digital images? What are they hiding?


The election was RIGGED, FAKE ballots were stuffed in at the last minute, and now the COVER-UP of that!


Click the video below to watch Judge Moore’s statement on why he has not yet conceded the “election” that he recorded Wednesday:



We are also waiting for the military ballots to come in so there is still a chance for this to work itself out if certain immoral politicians do not further meddle. For now, we wait.


Three Quick Lessons from the ‘Borking’ of Judge Roy Moore
by Dr. Scott Lively


Dr. Scott Lively, an attorney, author and pastor, is the President of Defend the Family International and a Republican candidate for Governor in the deep purple state of Massachusetts in the 2018 election.


I’m going to keep this short and to the point. Pundits and political scientists will be dissecting the Jones/Moore election for years to come but there are three critical lessons for conservatives that we must recognize now.


First, that the take-down of Judge Moore was decidedly not about vindicating newly-minted and highly suspect accusations of decades-old alleged sexual misconduct, it was about keeping a genuinely independent Bible-believing Christian conservative from joining President Donald Trump in the essential mission of draining the swamp in Washington D.C..


Judge Roy Moore would have been to the US Senate and to President Trump what Judge Robert Bork would have been to the US Supreme Court and to President Ronald Reagan – a clear and present danger to every political skunk, rat and RINO in D.C.. The real target of this is Trump, just as the “borking” of Judge Bork was about targeting Reagan.


Second, Alabama’s political chaos – and the national tsunami of sex scandals the preceded it – was not the result of some spontaneous social revolt against male predation, but a calculated and diabolical political strategy of the Purple Revolution.


The Purple Revolution is America’s version of the George Soros “color revolutions” that have perfected the art of social crisis as a political weapon-of-mass-destruction for the purpose of “regime change” at the national level. These orchestrated sex scandals (with no end in sight) are intended to energize the feminist base of the Democrat Party and draw large numbers of Republican women into their orbit for a 2018 thru 2020 campaign demanding female leadership to save the nation from male debauchery. I’ve written about that here:


Toxic Feminism, Part 2 – The Rebranding Of The Democratic Party


There are two reasons America’s revolution color is purple. Reason one, it represents the unity of the elites across party lines. The blending of blue establishment Democrats (headed by the Clinton Dynasty and Obama) and red establishment Republicans (headed by the Bush Dynasty) results in a purple “Uniparty.” That unity was on full display in the “borking” of Judge Moore. This is their revolution.


And, just as the blue part of the team was willing to throw a few Hollywood perverts and Al Franken under the bus to set up a takedown of Moore – like tipping over a domino aimed at Donald Trump – so is the red part of the team apparently willing to sacrifice it’s senate majority for the sake of saving the purple Uniparty from death by swamp-draining.


Reason two is that purple is the color of the LGBT movement, allegiance to which is a high priority for the Uniparty and their one-world-government co-conspirators around the globe. The sexual revolution is absolutely key to collapsing the family-based societal infrastructure that motivates and empowers nations to resist assimilation into open-border global socialism. And the “gays” are the key activists and agitators who drive the sexual revolution everywhere. As an unshakeable champion of Biblical marriage and opposition to LGBT agenda, Judge Moore represented perhaps the biggest threat to the Uniparty that the US Senate had ever faced, which explains in part why they expended such vast resources to take him out, but also explains why their method involved allegations of grave sexual sin. They couldn’t just beat him, they had to destroy him politically.


Third and last, the battle to save America from the Uniparty will be decided in 2018. Of course, every election these days is cast in apocalyptic terms, so people get a bit jaded in hearing this sort of rhetoric. But these actually are apocalyptic times! Can you imagine the condition America would be in today if the Clinton Crime Family had not been defeated by Donald Trump in 2016? Just think about all the hatred, slander and dirty tricks being directed at President Trump since the election instead being directed from a war room in the Clinton White House against all American conservatives: mowing down all resistance to the globalist agenda like a Nazi machine gun at a prisoner-of-war camp.


That’s what’s a stake in 2018! If we conservatives lose either house in the 2018 election, the swamp-draining pumps will grind instantly to a halt and the next two years will offer nothing but scorched-earth political warfare to destroy Donald Trump. The global populist revolution will have been broken and America will be assimilated into the New World Order.


That’s the real lesson of the “borking” of Judge Moore. This is a fight to the political death of America or the Uniparty and we’d better act accordingly.


DNA Testing Companies like 23andme Admit Adding Fake African Ancestry To White Profiles in order to “Screw With Racists”
By Alisha Sherron


Alisha is a blogger, youtuber, and radio show co-host.


Who were your ancestors? What is your ethnic background composed of? Sites like Ancestry.com and 23andme have always been some go to sources in answering all of your toughest questions. But how accurate are they? In a recent interview with Cracked, one of the major ancestry testing companies, (which specific company is unknown) spilled the beans on what really happens when you purchase an ancestry kit. While I can’t say I’m surprised, you may be shocked to learn that these ancestry sites aren’t always as accurate as they claim to be. Beyond this, they’ve also admitted to tampering with the result to “screw with racists.”


When Inside Edition had a set of triplets send their spit in to Ancestry.com and 23andMe, they got wildly different results from both services. Neither gave each triplet the same ancestry results. “Tests can be a crapshoot. For DNA tests, they use genetic markers, which are little variations in the DNA one or several groups may have, but others do not. The more markers there are, the more accurate the test will be.”


Shocked yet? Yeah, I didn’t think so. A lot of my friends have taken these types of DNA Tests, and most of them come back saying, “I don’t think this is entirely accurate…”


Remember when white supremacist Craig Cobb found out that he was 14% black? Well as it turns out, there’s a possibility that those numbers could have been fudged with.


Morgan and his colleagues were caught between a rock and a really-want-to-mess-with-racists place. It would’ve been fun to throw a “10 percent West African” in there, but then they might have a pissed-off, dangerous person at their office, waving a gun. “Since we couldn’t do anything to the results (and we wanted to), what we did was add ‘< 1 percent' to each African category of ethnicity. That way we weren't lying, and they would both be wondering how much under a percentage point was. We always try to round to the nearest number because we sometimes hear about percentage points, but for them, we leave it open to whether it's a one or a zero."   It's a compromise that's elegant in its passive-aggressive simplicity. And it got a result. "The near-N-bomber wrote to us asking what that meant, and we wrote back that it meant it was under 1 percent. And we were not saying zero. Unless they got another test, that was going to bother them. Maybe they weren't 100 percent Caucasian. I mean, they were, according to the results, but this way it leaves it open, and they'll always be wondering."   This is beyond shady and deceptive, people pay more than they can really afford sometimes, just to find out the truth about their heritage. What about this is acceptable? How does this turn a racist into a "non racist"? It doesn't. There's nothing but high levels of dishonesty in these companies. Unfortunately, this doesn't even fully cover the other things they do behind closed doors.   With a massive database of genetic information, the company can turn around and sell that data to other companies. Plenty of those companies are doing scientific research that can only be done with access to large amounts of genetic information. Even government agencies like the National Institutes of Health use the data to better understand the hereditary causes of diseases. Popular Science reports. Also, AncestryDNA has a partnership with the Google-owned biotech Calico, and shares the DNA of unsuspecting victims in the name of science and helpful research.   If you were hesitant to purchase these kind of kits before, I'd highly advise you to just save your money and discourage SJW's from telling every white person that they're black.   In the last several days I have received dozens of eMails asking me what I think about Keaton Jones.   Here is a video from ABC news:  


and here is the video from the Canadian news:



Honestly, I do not know what to think of Keaton’s mother, Kimberly. Having seen photos of Keaton’s scumball father, and given the fact that Kimberly Jones was not raped, I have to question the woman’s character, intelligence, judgement, and common sense – not to mention self respect (and thats putting it politely).


That said, I do not think that Keaton, or anyone else for that matter should be bullied at school or anywhere. And I believe that the liberals in this country, the news media, etc. should be ashamed of themselves for making collateral damage of an already suffering little boy in their ever-sprawling attack against Southern Heritage in general and the Confederate Flag in particular. The school-yard bullies are kids – grown people in Media and politics should simply KNOW BETTER.


Until Next Week,
Deo Vindice!
Chaplain Ed


Dixie Heritage
P.O. Box 618
Lowell, FL 32663