‘Sons’ want to rewrite Civil War history
 
From: connie_ward@cox.net
To: steve.dick@heraldbulletin.com
 
http://cnhinews.com/node/935
 
Mr. Dick,
 
Perhaps you think the Sons of Confederate Veterans "rewrite history" because they know things you don’t know, so you think they’re just makin’ it up. Let me  help you get beyond that.
 
Ever heard of "sectionalism"?  For decades before the war, the northern states had victimized Southern states using slavery as the excuse.  Lincoln’s own Secretary of State, William Seward, knew this and said so as early as 1850 in a speech about statehood for California: "Every question, political, civil, or ecclesiastical, however foreign to the subject of slavery, brings up slavery as an incident, and the incident supplants the principal question."
 
Read that again. The incident, slavery, supplants the principle question. In other words, there were other issues — issues that today, people like you refuse to acknowledge, so greatly do you desire to cling to the all-slavery, only-slavery explanation. I guess, for some reason, it gives you the warm fuzzies of moral superiority, which you simply can’t get if you look at the WHOLE PICTURE.
 
Read Georgia’s and Mississippi’s secession declarations, and try not to be so blinded by the passages that mention slavery, as most people are, that you can’t read further.  Try to read on beyond them and see what the OTHER problems were. Both documents are LISTS of ways the north had victimized these two states using slavery as the excuse, but I’ll use only Mississippi’s in this letter.
 
Although the document begins with "Our position is thoroughly identified with slavery," it sure mention lots of OTHER issues.  Lots of ’em. See for yourself.
 
With slavery as the excuse, the north had "…deprived the South of more than half the territory acquired from France….dismembered Texas and seized upon all the territory acquired from Mexico…"
 
Territory? TERRITORY?  But-but-but we’re told it was ALL ABOUT SLAVERY and ONLY ABOUT SLAVERY. This is because people like you QUIT READING after "Our position is thoroughly identified with slavery…."
 
Not this time.  Keep reading.
 
What other ways had the north victimized Mississippi and its people using slavery as the excuse?  Well, it "…trampled the equality of the South underfoot …promoted insurrection and incindiarism in our midst … enlisted its press, its pulpit and its schools against us, until the whole popular mind of the North is excited and inflamed with prejudice…
 
In other words, Mr. Dick, slavery was the excuse for stirring  up sheer, blanket HATRED in the North for Southerners.
 
Moreover, it " …  seeks not to elevate or to support the slave, but to destroy his present condition without providing a better … "
 
Hmmm…. sounds like the more things change, the more they stay the same, huh? To this day, northern do-goodism is frequently about bellyaching over problems — indeed, sometimes making them worse — without offering solutions.
 
Oh, but don’t stop reading now.  "It has invaded a State, and invested with the honors of martyrdom the wretch whose purpose was to apply flames to our dwellings, and the weapons of destruction to our lives …. it has broken every compact into which it has entered for our security…"
 
Security? SECURITY? Mississippians were concerned about their security? Concerned for their very lives? Yes, in case you’re having trouble with that part of the document, it means slavery was the excuse for putting the lives of the Southern people in danger.  But-but-but we’re told it was ALL ABOUT SLAVERY and ONLY ABOUT SLAVERY — that keepin’ their slaves was the only thing Southerners cared about. Right?  RIGHT?
 
Keep reading, Mr. Dick, we’re not finished yet. IIf killing Southerners didn’t work out, the north designed and desired economic ruin for the South, using slavery as the excuse:
 
"….It has given indubitable evidence of its design to ruin our agriculture, to prostrate our industrial pursuits and to destroy our social system … "
 
And we know, don’t we, that’s EXACTLY what the north’s war against the South achieved — economic ruin so devastating it lasted for generations.
 
All about slavery?  Only about slavery?  Only to the extent that the north used slavery as the excuse to vent its hatred of the South, and as the method whereby to acquire the South’s wealth for itself….
 
I’ve shown you how to pull the scales from your eyes using Misssissippi’s secession document; see if you can do it for yourself using Georgia’s.
 
Then, remember this.  Only the states of the Deep South seceded, in part, due to issues related to slavery.  The states of the upper South seceded ONLY AFTER Lincoln called forth a freaking ARMY to invade the seceded states.
 
I suppose it’s too much to expect you to issue an apology to the Sons of Confederate Veterans.  We’ll just have to settle with using your attitude as a marvelous illustration of what the South seceded from.
 
Sincerely,
 
Connie Ward