Karl Marx, Abraham Lincoln—Identical Agendas

Al Benson, Jr.

Over the years I have mentioned, in many articles, the connections between what went on in Europe in 1848 and what went on in America from 1861-1865. A few of these articles may still be out there on the Internet.Marx

Many have looked askance, or down their noses, at my research and contentions. It has never occurred to them that 1848 in Europe could ever have anything to do with 1861 in the United States. That thinking is way outside the box for them and they would just as soon stay inside the box. They are comfortable discussing battles, generals, stragegies, personalities, and so forth. They don’t wish to go where I have been. Or, as one homeschooling mom once said to me when I brought up the subject of the sainted Mr. Lincoln: "I’m a great fan of Abraham Lincoln. I don’t want to go there with you." She didn’t. Thankfully, others have made the trip, not because of anything I did, but on their own.

John J. Dwyer, in his excellent new history, The War Between the States—America’s Uncivil War, has made the connections. He has duly noted:

What became the single overarching Revolution of 1848 failed in all eighteen places where it broke out. But the ideas it spawned would survive to define the century that followed…America’s conflict of 1861-65 is rarely considered in this context, at least by Americans. An awareness of it is critical in grasping the key philosophical principles at stake in the struggle between what became the Northern and Southern governments. Just as European theology, fashions and culture influenced 19th century America, particularly the North, so did European political theory. The tens of thousands of Europeans who participated in the 1848 revolutions and then immigrated to America (again, especially the North) accelerated this influence..The revolutionaries of 1848 faced an America with three different cultures, economies, and religious bases. They determined to remove those differences by a series of political manuevers.

And, in many instances, their instrument for removing those differences was "The Communist Manifesto." We might, indeed should, ask how close Lincoln and then the Radical Reconstruction crowd after him, came to implement Marxist goals in the United States. Let us take just a brief look at what Marx advocated for the overthrow of a country and see how close Lincoln & Associates approximated it.

* Marx advocated the elimination of private property. Lincoln’s radicals advocated mandatory property taxes, to be determined by and payable to the government, or else the "owner’s" property is duly confiscated (stolen). Does that one sound familiar to anyone in our day?
* Marx sought a progressive "graduated income tax." Mr. Lincoln gave us the Internal Revenue Service in 1862 and we are still "doubly blessed" with that institution today.
* Marx wanted state control of banking. During the war years we got the Federal Banking Act. And Marx also sought state-controlled currency. Lincoln’s administration gave us the National Banking Act in 1863. Mr. Marx wanted state-controlled labor, and today we have federal wage controls.
* The Marxists advocated state-controlled agriculture. The Southern Redistribution Act redistributed much property in the South into collectives. Much more was just plain taken for the construction of "public" educational facilities (indoctrination centers). Naturally, all of this property was under the control of Yankee carpetbaggers.
* And then, the crowning achievement—state controlled education. Marx sought "free education for all children in public schools." The Morrill Land Grant Act, passed during Mr. Lincoln’s tenure in office, authorized federal aid to established, government-controlled colleges. Naturally, with such aid came the attached strings—government regulations. And today, we in the South, as well as the rest of the country, suffer with the illegitimate child of "Reconstruction," the government school system, which works overtime teaching the South’s children to be ashamed of their history and heritage.

In light of all this, just ask yourself how identical were the goals of Marx and Lincoln and his radical followers. Go back and read the list again. I may be a bit dense but I can’t seem to find any major differences between Marxism and Lincolnism, but then, that’s just me.

Ask yourself how many of these little Marxist/Lincolnist treats we all live with today, even under our supposedly "conservative" administration. Maybe we have already become the Marxist/Lincolnist States of Amerika and don’t even realize it. But, then, as they say "the brainwashed never wonder."

copyrighted 2005 by MacDonald King Aston

On The Web: http://www.fireeater.org/HTML/WRITERS/Benson/Benson_2005/marx_Lincoln.htm